User Tools

Site Tools


energy

This is an old revision of the document!


Energy

Let's experiment with our new collective writing technique by dividing this page into three sections: NOW (2117) where we describe something like solar communism with all its benefits THEN (2017 where we list all the horrors and ecological consequences of carbon-based capitalism with it Military-Industrial-complex and warring security states. Let's consider this ENERGY page like a neighborhood mural, but one divided into sections. Now lets 'throw paint' at the well as Dickie has suggested. Just add examples, anecdotes, one after another under NOW, THEN, and HOW? We can then go back later and edit. Let everyone add SOMETHING - a sentence, a paragraph, a scene an idea – and see what we end up with.

START HERE:

NOW (your additions here)

David: Solar Communism has prevailed and the Earth uses 100% renewable energy. Energy poverty is eliminated in the world. Every child born expects the highest quality of life and life expectancy. Everyone inherits the bio-diversity we have now. By 2117 CO2 levels are less than 350ppm, warming was stopped at less than 1.5 degrees celsius, humanity and the earth have adapted to these changes. Most of the world exists as bio-diversity preserves. Healthy, green, urbanization was used to concentrate human activity and relieve nature. Heavy use of vertical farming and suburban food production. We ended mass production of grain for fuel and feed. Earth has been invited to join the Galactic Club, which screens out civilizations that are not yet ready. We finally earned an invite!

Fred: Northeastern US folks are living in small-scale cities on waterways - former de-industrialized and depopulated areas. Agriculturally and transportation rich areas. Built at “human scale”: walkable and self-propelled vehicles paired with limited public transportation leading to increased overall health. Examples, Troy, NY, Danbury, CT. Breakdown between city and countryside. Community interaction and communication around food and manufactured goods exchanges. Contact brought back to human level.

THEN (your additions here)

State sponsored monopoly away from use value (feeding people) toward creating profits for corporations. $5 trillion/year is spent in direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuel/nuclear energy producers (David, quoting IMF).

Brian’s report:

  • Good news re: renewable energy-moving faster than once thought possible. Up to 30% in some areas.
  • Fossil fuel consumption already beginning to level off. Rate of growth of energy consumption is beginning to level off.
  • Policies that will lead to banning of internal combustion vehicles in next 10-20 years: France/UK/India/some European car companies.
  • Green City designs.
  • Food system: poised for rapid transition. World Hunger 10 Myths: world produces enough now to provide every human being with 2900 calories per day-just from the “leftovers”. Doesn’t include grain for feed or ethanol. 1 of 4 calories are wasted. Places high hunger rates are actually net exporters of agricultural products! Ex: India
  • Organic agriculture is possible, more resilient. Yields higher in polycultures; Permaculture; sequestration of carbon through right combination of crops (carbon farming).

[Since my presentation wasn't videoed, Richard asked me (Brian) to post my summary notes, which are as follows, to supplement what Jenny posted:]

Feasibility of transition

Energy: Already 30& renewable in many locales; Foss. fuel consumption leveling off

Transportation: Bans on internal combustion vehicles in several countries; carmakers like Volvo pledging to phase out sooner

Food:

  • Food First numbers re: plenty of food is being grown (2015 edition of Lappé/Collins' World Hunger 10 Myths)
  • Organic advantage, adaptability + polycultures vs. monoculture
  • Permaculture & carbon farming (Eric Toensmeier)

Capitalist obstacles:

  • A. Lovins' long advocacy for a 'business-centered' transition vs. what we know about profits vs. efficiency as capitalist priorities.
  • A. Malm's insights (last full chapter of Fossil Capital).
  • Public vs. private investment strategies.

Also Brian added 6 docs. to the ReconstrucTexts folder on Dropbox for yesterday’s class, but it may be more useful to put them in the folder for next week, perhaps?

4 Mark Jacobson articles:

  1. Original Scientific American summary from 2009
  2. 2 papers from Energy Policy (2011) providing supporting evidence
  3. 2015 paper documenting strategies for 50 US states, as summarized on his website, http://thesolutionsproject.org

2 by Andreas Malm:

  1. Summary article covering the basic arguments from his book, from Historical Materialism (2013)
  2. Chapter from the end of his book on obstacles to renewable energy under capitalism

I’m not sure what’s out there in English on the European green cities project I mentioned, but here’s an Italian and a German site:

Dave’s report:

  • Germany: total energy 13% renewable, electricity is 30%
  • Solar Communism: must be international. Eco-socialist transitions will look different all over the world.
  • Hardly a place on Earth that has not been impacted by human activity.
  • Both quantity and quality of energy that is critical to post-capitalist society. “How Much Energy Does Humanity Need? And What Kind?”
  • Solar is most abundant source of energy. Using low entropy radiation to do work. Two hours of solar radiation to the Earth's surface =total global primary energy consumption by civilization (18 trillion wattyear) in one year. Solar power is least controlled by military/industrial complex so available for local organization. Must control the transition under capitalism to maximize protection of health and ecology.
  • Unprecedented opportunity to prevent catastrophic climate change. Must also rapidly decrease use of fossil fuels after reaching plateau or we are doomed (Current level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (400 ppm) must be brought down and stabilized to a safe level, below 350ppm in this century).
  • Humanity likely needs more energy than we use now - 18 trillion wattyear, to eliminate existing energy poverty; make possible industrial sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere (the only form of industrial geo engineering that is imperative); Potentially most important technology (combining carbon water with the right kind of rocks, e.g., basalt which is high in Ca, Mg and Fe silicates).

Samuel: Strong attachment to existing power structures and relationships.

Fred: I have added to the Dropbox at ReconstrucTexts some excerpts from the Conclusion to Jeremy Davies's The Birth of the Anthropocene, including this - “The rough transition out of the Holocene has seen the deadening or searing away of one ecological community after another. Its keynote environmental effects have been depatterning and subordination to single authorities. In the clear-cutting of forests; the draining of wetlands; the damming, dredging, channelization, and eutrophication of rivers; the exhaustion, salinization, contamination, and erosion of soil; bottom trawling; strip-mining; and the ever-expanding imposition of precarious, input-saturated monocultures, complex ecologies have been dispersed and simplified in order to tame them into servicing the extractive demands of international capital. To negotiate the transition in a just and bearable way, what is needed is to maximize the countervailing presence of plural, diverse, and polycentric ecosystems. Speaking very generally, the hardships of the transition can be cushioned by fostering variegated communities of life, dense with competing biogeochemical pathways. The most resilient ecosystems, just like the most flourishing civil societies, tend to be those that function as a conversation between many different voices….”

HOW? (your additions here)

David: Under “really existing capitalism,” solar is also the energy source most compatible with decentralized, democratic management and control, relatively free of the dictates of the Military Industrial Complex (MIC), compared to fossil fuels and nuclear power.“ And further closely related is my scenario 2 in “4 Scenarios for 2050”, “Between 2015 and 2020, large-scale implementation of high-efficiency thin film photovoltaics, low-cost capture of ocean currents, and high-elevation tapping of wind energy begins to rapidly decarbonize global energy supplies, radically undermining the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) because of the growing availability of very low-cost clean energy, which requires virtually no rare strategic metals.”

Richard: HOW (in between) where we describe how positive elements like a growing climate justice movement, the increasing cheapness of solar, wind, etc. consumers organizations and such combine to provide alternatives, where slowly but surely alternate energy is gaining ground, where the oil giants, in a frenzy to protect the value of what would be their stranded assets if oil were left 'in the ground' commit every more disastrous spills in a race for profit spark mass opposition, where these factors combine with global labor strikes and popular revolts that lead to REVOLUTIONARY Emergence on a planetary scale, at which point, through decisions of global federations a world-wide plan to replace carbon with renewables is put in place and revised over time, leading to NOW.

Brian: Movement of movements, like the Commune; Municipal activism-secede from the system. Defensive battles need to reorient, be more proactive. Community conversations about what people really want and need. Reduction of dependency. Early years of the organic movement/food coop movement were seen as part of the resistance. Providing healthy food so people can be revolutionaries. Inspired by the memory of these relationships and the leadership of Standing Rock protesters, the alternative lifestyle folks become politically activated.

David: States moves subsidies to renewable energy sector. Three-pronged strategy: Carbon farming; Industrial carbon sequestration from the atmosphere; and rapid reduction of fossil fuel use.

Samuel: Mass planting of Mulberry Trees

Dan: Local movements take control of their energy and food production/consumption, starting in Montpelier, Vermont. Small successes lead to replication, first to neighboring communities and then to state level.

Barry: Successfully broadcast the sense of possibility. Social structures oriented to harmonize forces in non-violent way.

Samuel: Something challenges (replaces) the existing “utopia of money.”

energy.1507992596.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/10/14 10:49 by David Schwartzman