premises
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
premises [2019/01/13 11:09] admin created |
premises [2019/01/13 11:10] (current) admin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Premises | Premises | ||
| + | |||
| 1. The Pascalian bet: one chance in 100 (or 1000) for humanity to survive the 21 st | 1. The Pascalian bet: one chance in 100 (or 1000) for humanity to survive the 21 st | ||
| century? | century? | ||
| + | |||
| 2. If that chance exists, we ought to be able to imagine it as sci-fi, no? | 2. If that chance exists, we ought to be able to imagine it as sci-fi, no? | ||
| + | |||
| 3. The power of utopias to awaken people to struggle is proven | 3. The power of utopias to awaken people to struggle is proven | ||
| + | |||
| 4. Today more than every people need a credible positive vision | 4. Today more than every people need a credible positive vision | ||
| + | |||
| 5. Looking backward from the future has many advantages. | 5. Looking backward from the future has many advantages. | ||
| + | |||
| 6. Marx’s believe in a future socialist society enabled him to analyze the present | 6. Marx’s believe in a future socialist society enabled him to analyze the present | ||
| capitalist society as temporary, part of a series of societies that rise and fall. | capitalist society as temporary, part of a series of societies that rise and fall. | ||
| + | |||
| 7. Looking backward simplifies complex situations as we “know” in what | 7. Looking backward simplifies complex situations as we “know” in what | ||
| direction they are going. | direction they are going. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 20: | ||
| 8. Looking backward as future historians keeps us from quarrelling like rival | 8. Looking backward as future historians keeps us from quarrelling like rival | ||
| sectarians as we have all been dead for at least 70 years. | sectarians as we have all been dead for at least 70 years. | ||
| + | |||
| 9. Basic rules for Future Historians: No Gods, no Extraterrestrials, no infallible | 9. Basic rules for Future Historians: No Gods, no Extraterrestrials, no infallible | ||
| vanguard parties. Plurality of future societies and roads thereto. | vanguard parties. Plurality of future societies and roads thereto. | ||
| + | |||
| Methods (evolving) of our International Study Group and Collective Writing | Methods (evolving) of our International Study Group and Collective Writing | ||
| Project | Project | ||
| + | |||
| During its first year, the Study Group outlined some twenty Study Topics, including | During its first year, the Study Group outlined some twenty Study Topics, including | ||
| Economics, Energy, Women, Utopias etc. From week to week, we gathered materials | Economics, Energy, Women, Utopias etc. From week to week, we gathered materials | ||
| Line 26: | Line 36: | ||
| our WIKI at http://futurehistorians.org/doku.php?id=start The originality of our | our WIKI at http://futurehistorians.org/doku.php?id=start The originality of our | ||
| project is threefold: | project is threefold: | ||
| + | |||
| 1. Most previous utopian fictions don’t really tell us HOW people were about to | 1. Most previous utopian fictions don’t really tell us HOW people were about to | ||
| get from capitalist barbarism to a better world | get from capitalist barbarism to a better world | ||
| + | |||
| 2. The future societies proposed by Thomas Moore and his successors are all to | 2. The future societies proposed by Thomas Moore and his successors are all to | ||
| an extent monolithic, from Bellamy’s rigid socialism of Looking Backward to | an extent monolithic, from Bellamy’s rigid socialism of Looking Backward to | ||
| Line 33: | Line 45: | ||
| Nowhere. Ours will be plural, pluralistic and planetary, with plenty of room | Nowhere. Ours will be plural, pluralistic and planetary, with plenty of room | ||
| for variety and individual taste. | for variety and individual taste. | ||
| + | |||
| 3. Often previous Utopias are not realistic, credible, in conformity with historical | 3. Often previous Utopias are not realistic, credible, in conformity with historical | ||
| and scientific/technological knowns. | and scientific/technological knowns. | ||
| + | |||
| The solution to these problems we came up with is entitled: Then, Now, and How. It | The solution to these problems we came up with is entitled: Then, Now, and How. It | ||
| takes the form of a history book aimed at young people a century from today, which | takes the form of a history book aimed at young people a century from today, which | ||
| Line 43: | Line 57: | ||
| the form of a Grid. This ever growing patchwork allows for great diversity and | the form of a Grid. This ever growing patchwork allows for great diversity and | ||
| avoids sectarian rigidity. (Show demonstration on line). | avoids sectarian rigidity. (Show demonstration on line). | ||
| + | |||
| For THEN we patch together excerpts contemporary critical studies of capitalism into | For THEN we patch together excerpts contemporary critical studies of capitalism into | ||
| a coherent narrative and then change the very tenses into the past. We call this the | a coherent narrative and then change the very tenses into the past. We call this the | ||
| Line 49: | Line 64: | ||
| into irrefutable historical accounts in the reader’s mind. Their long-dead authors get | into irrefutable historical accounts in the reader’s mind. Their long-dead authors get | ||
| referenced as “prescient.” | referenced as “prescient.” | ||
| + | |||
| For NOW we borrow from every kind of predictive writing, fiction, authors | For NOW we borrow from every kind of predictive writing, fiction, authors | ||
| advocating ideas like municipal socialism and solar communism. Only we change the | advocating ideas like municipal socialism and solar communism. Only we change the | ||
premises.txt · Last modified: 2019/01/13 11:10 by admin
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
